|
Bullying Studies
Postal Service Supervisor AND Manager Guilty of
Abuse
"Violence in the workplace begins long before fists fly, or lethal
weapons extinguish lives. Where resentment and aggression routinely
displace cooperation and communication, violence has occurred. Such
violence surfaces as threats, intimidation, harassment, and sub-lethal
assault..."
|
| |
As suggested in the BullyBusting
Strategies section of the book, The Bully At Work, everyone
should first hold employers accountable for faithfully enforcing
their own lofty, noble internal feel-good, "respect for all"
policies. Short of breaking a law, conscientious employers, who care
about credibility with employees, expect to be held responsible for
violating internal policies. However, the reality is that policies
designed to restrain negative behavior are typically aimed at
non-supervisory employees. "Violence prevention" means stopping
employees from being violent, while ignoring daily psychological
violence perpetrated by supervisors and their enabling managers who
refuse to apply policies to themselves.
Obviously, the Postal Service
thinks anti-violence policies do NOT apply to their managers. Of all
governmental and quasi-governmental agencies, the Postal Service,
more than any other should be intolerant of abusive misconduct by
anyone since they spent $4 million to produce the fall 2000 Califano
report on the unsafe workplace at USPS focusing on the role of
physical violence there. The erroneous conclusion of that myopic
report was to raise the salaries of managers to attract a better
class of managers, ostensibly to improve the 1/20 chance employees
will experience physical violence rather than to tackle the
unfettered exposure of employees to verbal abuse (as illustrated
below) that affects 1 in 3 USPS employees!
Here is a real story about a
federal arbitrator working in Wisconsin who stated the obvious about
bullying in a Nov. 2000 ruling. Despite the Postal Service denials
through all steps of a union grievance process, the courageous
arbitrator punished the agency in a unique way that certainly
provided the bullied letter carrier with a greater sense of justice
achieved than most people who pursue legal remedies in court. (See
Remedies below)
The ruling described below should
give hope to all bullied individuals and unions who feel hopeless
facing down bully managers armed with nothing more than agency
policies. Bullying is part of the Anti-Violence Policy upon which
this grievance was based and the term is used throughout the
arbitration Decision and Award document, as part of the Arbitrator's
own language.
More
|